One of the differences between NAIFs (non-critical AI fanboys... please don't be one) and me is that I believe in gathering evidence before making strong claims about how a system is likely to behave. … [Read more...] about Serious Data From Testing LLMs
AI and Testing
Seriously Testing LLMs
Michael and I are getting a lot of interest about how we apply Rapid Software Testing methodology both to test AI and to use AI in testing. We've developed various answers to such questions in recent … [Read more...] about Seriously Testing LLMs
Is There Something in Your “I”?
If you present someone else's work as if it were your own, no one will respect you, and you won't even respect yourself. If someone is paying you to do thoughtful work, and they come to believe you … [Read more...] about Is There Something in Your “I”?
WAIT #2 Peer Conference Report
My brother and I continued our peer conference series meant to explore the experiences of serious testers with AI and subject them to scrutiny. We call this the Workshop on AI in Testing (WAIT). Our … [Read more...] about WAIT #2 Peer Conference Report
WAIT#2 Call for Participation
The Workshop on AI in Testing (WAIT) #2 WAIT is a small, two-day, online, non-commercial, LAWST-style peer conference. Facilitator Jon Bach Content Owner James Bach Dates June … [Read more...] about WAIT#2 Call for Participation
WAIT #1 Peer Conference Report
I'm the opposite of an AI fanboy. I've been arguing against the grandiose claims of the AI industry for decades. But the days are over when I can make an occasional case against it and then go back to … [Read more...] about WAIT #1 Peer Conference Report