• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Satisfice, Inc.

Software Testing for Serious People

  • Home
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
  • Methodology
    • Exploratory Testing
    • Reasons to Repeat Tests
  • Consulting
    • Ways to Engage Our Services
  • Classes
    • James Bach’s Public Test Consulting
    • Testimonials
    • RST Courses Offered
    • Rapid Software Testing Explored
    • Rapid Software Testing Applied
    • Rapid Software Testing Managed
    • Rapid Software Testing Coached
    • Rapid Software Testing Focused: Risk
    • Rapid Software Testing Focused: Strategy
  • Schedule
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Resources
    • Downloads
    • Bibliography: Exploratory Process
    • Bibliography: Risk Analysis
    • Bibliography: Coaching
    • Bibliography: Usability
    • Bibliography: My Stuff From IEEE Computer and IEEE Software Magazines
    • Bibliography: The Sociology of Harry Collins

Integrity 2: On Being Under the Radar [REVISED]

I have taken down the original text of this post at the request of my colleague who had the courage and audacity to let me post his detailed comment about how he works “under the radar” to change things in his company.

I had posted his comment originally with his permission, of course. But, apparently, in his country, “it’s illegal to harm [one’s] employer’s business” and it can reasonably be considered doing harm to express a low opinion of your own company’s behavior, even if you are dedicated to improving that behavior. Dirty laundry in public is arguably bad for business, if your business involves telling people that you’re a trustworthy expert, and your laundry says otherwise.

Of course this is understandable. Working under the radar generally means not being public about what you are doing. Therefore, as much as I prefer the clean feeling of working ON the radar, I wish him good luck with his mode of influencing a big, commercial, ceremonial system.

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Ethics

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Maaret Pyhäjärvi says

    January 2, 2014 at 5:03 am

    I work under the same legislation as the original text author and have worked on similar companies without needing to consider that my different opinion would be harmful. It could also be considered that the state of the practice is harmful, and that some (enlightened) customers consider these examples to show the versatility the large companies are able to do for their customers.

    The term “under the radar” implies there is something not positive going on, and focuses on contrasting what is being done on something assumed that needs to be done. Having worked in very similar contexts, I would claim that one’s own attitude on approaching this has a lot to do with how positively / negatively it is taken. If you assume your method, e.g. TMap denies you all applying your common sense and working smartly under time constraints considering the opportunity cost, you probably are reading too much into the method.

    There’s plenty of smart testers who do smart work within stupid frameworks and don’t make a fuss of it – they just deal with it. Many of them are appreciated and not threatened with the illegalities of harming employer’s business.

    This was a great post to make me realize that the metaphors we use for communication (like “under the radar”) do make a difference. Thank you!

    Reply
  2. The Original Author says

    March 3, 2014 at 2:08 pm

    Hi Maaret,

    You haven’t spoken with me about this, you haven’t seen my presentations about this and ultimately you have no understanding about my work “under the radar”. So please don’t make any wild assumptions about it. It is not as devious as it sounds. It’s just working on something and trying to achieve something before talking about it. Simple adjustments here and there to help people to work more effectively. Nothing more.

    I will not talk about it anymore via textual medium. Not even Skype chat. It creates too much misunderstandings and drama. And there are only few things I hate more in our industry.

    The Original Author

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search

Categories

  • About Me (18)
  • Agile Methodology (14)
  • Automation (19)
  • Bug Investigation and Reporting (9)
  • Buggy Products (22)
  • Certification (10)
  • Context-Driven Testing (44)
  • Critique (41)
  • Ethics (19)
  • Exploratory Testing (32)
  • FAQ (5)
  • For Newbies (25)
  • Heuristics (28)
  • Important! (20)
  • Language (35)
  • Management (20)
  • Metrics (3)
  • Process Dynamics (27)
  • Quality (7)
  • Rapid Software Testing Methodology (22)
  • Risk Analysis (12)
  • RST (3)
  • Scientific Method (3)
  • Skills (30)
  • Test Coverage (7)
  • Test Documentation (8)
  • Test Oracles (4)
  • Test Reporting (11)
  • Test Strategy (26)
  • Testability (3)
  • Testing Culture (90)
  • Testing vs. Checking (17)
  • Uncategorized (10)
  • Working with Non-Testers (6)

Blog Archives

Footer

  • About James Bach
  • Satisfice Blog
  • Bibliography: Bach on IEEE
  • Contact James
  • Consulting
  • Engage Our Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • RST Courses
  • RST Explored
  • RST Applied
  • RST Managed
  • RST Coached
  • RST Focused: Risk
  • RST Focused: Strategy
  • RST Methodology
  • Exploratory Testing
  • Testing Training
  • Resources
  • Bibliography: Exploratory
  • Bibliography: Risk Analysis
  • Bibliography: Coaching
  • Bibliography: Usability
  • Bibliography: The Sociology of Harry Collins
  • Schedule
  • Upcoming Public Classes
  • Upcoming Online Classes
  • Public Events
  • Tester MeetUps

Copyright © 2023 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in