• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Satisfice, Inc.

Software Testing for Serious People

  • Home
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
  • Methodology
    • Exploratory Testing
    • Reasons to Repeat Tests
  • Consulting
    • Ways to Engage Our Services
  • Classes
    • James Bach’s Public Test Consulting
    • Testimonials
    • RST Courses Offered
    • Rapid Software Testing Explored
    • Rapid Software Testing Applied
    • Rapid Software Testing Managed
    • Rapid Software Testing Coached
    • Rapid Software Testing Focused: Risk
    • Rapid Software Testing Focused: Strategy
  • Schedule
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Resources
    • Downloads
    • Bibliography: Exploratory Process
    • Bibliography: Risk Analysis
    • Bibliography: Coaching
    • Bibliography: Usability
    • Bibliography: My Stuff From IEEE Computer and IEEE Software Magazines
    • Bibliography: The Sociology of Harry Collins

The Bestselling Software Intended for People Who Couldn’t Use It.

In 1983, my boss, Dale Disharoon, designed a little game called Alphabet Zoo. My job was to write the Commodore 64 and Apple II versions of that game. Alphabet Zoo is a game for kids who are learning to read. The child uses a joystick to move a little character through a maze, collecting letters to spell words.

We did no user testing on this game until the very day we sent the final software to the publisher. On that day, we discovered that our target users (five year-olds) did not have the ability to use a joystick well enough to play the game. They just got frustrated and gave up.

We shipped anyway.

This game became a bestseller.

alphabet-zoo

It was placed on a list of educational games recommended by the National Education Association.

alphabet-zoo-list
Source: Information Please Almanac, 1986

So, how to explain this?

Some years later, when I became a father, I understood. My son was able to play a lot of games that were too hard for him because I operated the controls. I spoke to at least one dad who did exactly that with Alphabet Zoo.

I guess the moral of the story is: we don’t necessarily know the value of our own creations.

Filed Under: Buggy Products, Risk Analysis

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Matt De Young says

    July 1, 2016 at 5:26 am

    This brings up an interesting point, okay it brings up several. The first one is that being a dad is an amazing learning process full of surprises and crazy awesome moments when you are slapped with the realization that your kids are smarter than you are. With brings up the second point kids are crazy smart and will do whatever they have to do in order play a game. The third and file point is that we have no idea how the products we will create are accepted, or in other words there is no accounting for taste.

    Reply
  2. Alex Henzell says

    July 2, 2016 at 8:15 am

    I wonder if the game was actually better because it required an adult’s presence, so they could help the child learn when needed (but with the child still in charge).

    It was probably bought by a lot of parents who thought they could just leave the child alone with it, but ended up actively helping the child learn.

    Reply
  3. Jordan Peters says

    July 13, 2016 at 12:08 pm

    I guess that shows you have to use tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge to understand your stakeholder. In this case, children who have a limited understand of their own application of the product. I’d be interested to know if they took parents into account when they decided to ship.

    [James’ Reply: We did not think about the parents at all.
    ]

    Reply
  4. KevinPyles says

    July 22, 2016 at 8:38 am

    Nice trick! You created a game that was going to help babysit kids, but then caused a bonding relationship between the parent and child. Is that a bait and switch? 🙂

    Reply
  5. Antonius Momac says

    August 10, 2017 at 5:47 am

    This is brilliant. I didn’t expect the outcome and I love it. The story and idea have incredible merit. Thank you, James. You always challenge my image of the world. And I’m a weirdo able to see a lot of variety. But you really spice it up.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search

Categories

  • About Me (18)
  • Agile Methodology (14)
  • Automation (19)
  • Bug Investigation and Reporting (9)
  • Buggy Products (22)
  • Certification (10)
  • Context-Driven Testing (44)
  • Critique (41)
  • Ethics (19)
  • Exploratory Testing (32)
  • FAQ (5)
  • For Newbies (25)
  • Heuristics (28)
  • Important! (20)
  • Language (35)
  • Management (20)
  • Metrics (3)
  • Process Dynamics (27)
  • Quality (7)
  • Rapid Software Testing Methodology (22)
  • Risk Analysis (12)
  • RST (3)
  • Scientific Method (3)
  • Skills (30)
  • Test Coverage (7)
  • Test Documentation (8)
  • Test Oracles (4)
  • Test Reporting (11)
  • Test Strategy (26)
  • Testability (3)
  • Testing Culture (90)
  • Testing vs. Checking (17)
  • Uncategorized (10)
  • Working with Non-Testers (6)

Blog Archives

Footer

  • About James Bach
  • Satisfice Blog
  • Bibliography: Bach on IEEE
  • Contact James
  • Consulting
  • Engage Our Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • RST Courses
  • RST Explored
  • RST Applied
  • RST Managed
  • RST Coached
  • RST Focused: Risk
  • RST Focused: Strategy
  • RST Methodology
  • Exploratory Testing
  • Testing Training
  • Resources
  • Bibliography: Exploratory
  • Bibliography: Risk Analysis
  • Bibliography: Coaching
  • Bibliography: Usability
  • Bibliography: The Sociology of Harry Collins
  • Schedule
  • Upcoming Public Classes
  • Upcoming Online Classes
  • Public Events
  • Tester MeetUps

Copyright © 2023 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in