<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SWEBOK Problems, Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.satisfice.com/kaner/?feed=rss2&#038;p=7" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.satisfice.com/kaner/?p=7</link>
	<description>On the craft and community of software testing</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.satisfice.com/kaner/?p=7&cpage=1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2003 21:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satisfice.com/kaner/?p=7#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Prof. Kaner,

It was fortunate that I came upon your SWEBOK review before I attempted to assimilate the contents of the SWEBOK document. 

As software testers in a small company with limited resources, we often seek out websites and documents that will help us to improve our testing, particularly since our testing organization is relatively young, and most of our testers have been testing for less than 5 years. 

We are still struggling to get it right, and always seeking a better way. SWEBOK seemed to present itself as a "standard" that we might be able to follow. Your evaluation of the Software Testing portion of the SWEBOK document has saved us a lot of time, which we will use to continue our quest to become better testers. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prof. Kaner,</p>
<p>It was fortunate that I came upon your SWEBOK review before I attempted to assimilate the contents of the SWEBOK document. </p>
<p>As software testers in a small company with limited resources, we often seek out websites and documents that will help us to improve our testing, particularly since our testing organization is relatively young, and most of our testers have been testing for less than 5 years. </p>
<p>We are still struggling to get it right, and always seeking a better way. SWEBOK seemed to present itself as a &#8220;standard&#8221; that we might be able to follow. Your evaluation of the Software Testing portion of the SWEBOK document has saved us a lot of time, which we will use to continue our quest to become better testers. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Norton's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.satisfice.com/kaner/?p=7&cpage=1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Norton's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2003 22:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satisfice.com/kaner/?p=7#comment-6</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;An Agile Review of the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK)&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>An Agile Review of the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK)</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


