<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oui, Pretentious Vous.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/94/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/94</link>
	<description>The Consulting Software Tester</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:21:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Dobson</title>
		<link>http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/94/comment-page-1#comment-48874</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Dobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 08:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/94#comment-48874</guid>
		<description>Jim,

This is a difficult one.  I understand Paulâ€™s anger but it was also a breath of fresh air reading Jonathonâ€™s article.  A long time ago I stopped calling myself agile and just stuck with the term â€œprofessional software engineerâ€?.  Maybe I am too a post agilist.

I think Paulâ€™s response may be a reaction to all the BS that surrounds Agile.  And there is a lot, donâ€™t you agree?  I find many posts on forums to be quite sickly and just not helpful.  Although angrily stated, Paul does make some interesting points.  Itâ€™s a shame he just didnâ€™t make them in an independent manner i.e. without the context of Jonathonâ€™s very good article.  And without attacking him by accusing him of writing like a thirteen year old philosopher.  Where I come from we would say that was well out of order.  And it might also earn you a punch in the nose.

Attacking someone like this is actually a very cruel thing to do.  We arenâ€™t all writers, and some of us are not great programmers or engineers.  However, we, as a community, are striving to improve ourselves (I know my writing isnâ€™t brilliant, but I have the right to express myself).  Bullying someone into not writing something by attacking their style is not only mean but rather authoritarian.

So, unfortunately, any of Paulâ€™s legitimate message is lost is the fury.  And people are drawing battle lines, picking sides.  Maybe these two need to talk.  If I were Paul I would have emailed Jonathon before publicly slagging him off.  But hey, that is only my opinion.

I will think about these two articles more carefully now.

Hope you are well mate, Jamie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>This is a difficult one.  I understand Paulâ€™s anger but it was also a breath of fresh air reading Jonathonâ€™s article.  A long time ago I stopped calling myself agile and just stuck with the term â€œprofessional software engineerâ€?.  Maybe I am too a post agilist.</p>
<p>I think Paulâ€™s response may be a reaction to all the BS that surrounds Agile.  And there is a lot, donâ€™t you agree?  I find many posts on forums to be quite sickly and just not helpful.  Although angrily stated, Paul does make some interesting points.  Itâ€™s a shame he just didnâ€™t make them in an independent manner i.e. without the context of Jonathonâ€™s very good article.  And without attacking him by accusing him of writing like a thirteen year old philosopher.  Where I come from we would say that was well out of order.  And it might also earn you a punch in the nose.</p>
<p>Attacking someone like this is actually a very cruel thing to do.  We arenâ€™t all writers, and some of us are not great programmers or engineers.  However, we, as a community, are striving to improve ourselves (I know my writing isnâ€™t brilliant, but I have the right to express myself).  Bullying someone into not writing something by attacking their style is not only mean but rather authoritarian.</p>
<p>So, unfortunately, any of Paulâ€™s legitimate message is lost is the fury.  And people are drawing battle lines, picking sides.  Maybe these two need to talk.  If I were Paul I would have emailed Jonathon before publicly slagging him off.  But hey, that is only my opinion.</p>
<p>I will think about these two articles more carefully now.</p>
<p>Hope you are well mate, Jamie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Barber</title>
		<link>http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/94/comment-page-1#comment-48266</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 21:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/94#comment-48266</guid>
		<description>Jim, 

Another point to demonstrate that Paul, IMHO, really just doesn&#039;t get it; I posted the response below to Paul&#039;s Blog -- which he has failed to approve to be displayed.

&quot;Ok, so you don&#039;t agree with Jonathan - how, exactly does that make him pretentious?

It&#039;s a blog, he&#039;s sharing his perspectives and experiences.  I know Jonathan, I know that he has made a personal commitment to speak *only* from experience.  So his experiences are different than yours.  What&#039;s wrong with that?

I also think that you&#039;re taking a lot of statements out of context. For instance, you criticize Jonathan for claiming that Agile is mainstream.  Mainstream need not refer to the &quot;most commonly used or implemented practice.&quot;  It can also refer to a &quot;commonly referenced philosophy.&quot;  So maybe in one sense, Agile isn&#039;t mainstream, but in another, it certainly qualifies.  Additionally, I assure you that it qualifies in both senses with regard to Jonathan&#039;s experiences.

I find Jonathan&#039;s perspective valuable.  He has now given me words to use and references to help me draw my own inferences based on my experiences.  I find that to be both honorable and professional, not pretentious.

If Jonathan were making some attempt to get others to agree with him, or stating that &quot;this is fact because I say so&quot;, that would be pretentious, but I don&#039;t see any of that.  I think Jonathan is very clear that these are *his* thoughts and *his* current way of expressing those thoughts.  I think that is exactly what you are doing here in your blog.  I praise you both for it.

In fact, I also find your counter-position valuable and only wish there were some more links to go with your references.  From where I sit, I don&#039;t see where your position and Jonathan&#039;s aren&#039;t complimentary.  I think you are actually saying very similar things from a different perspective.

I dunno, maybe you are using the tone to create a buzz (you certainly caught my attention).  I just don&#039;t like to see individuals flamed for sharing their experiences and personal opinions.  

Please, attack the concepts -- we need all of the well informed debate we can get in this industry -- but don&#039;t flame the person for having the guts to make their observations and interpretations public.

Anyway, that&#039;s just *my* position.  Pretentious?  Controversial?  Argumentative?  Self-Righteous?  Unpopular?  Maybe, but whatever it is, it is mine and I&#039;m willing to share it with others and I think that matters.&quot;

-- 
Scott Barber
President &amp; Chief Technologist, PerfTestPlus, Inc.
Executive Director, Association for Software Testing
www.perftestplus.com
www.associationforsoftwaretesting.org

&quot;If you can see it in your mind...
     you will find it in your life.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, </p>
<p>Another point to demonstrate that Paul, IMHO, really just doesn&#8217;t get it; I posted the response below to Paul&#8217;s Blog &#8212; which he has failed to approve to be displayed.</p>
<p>&#8220;Ok, so you don&#8217;t agree with Jonathan &#8211; how, exactly does that make him pretentious?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a blog, he&#8217;s sharing his perspectives and experiences.  I know Jonathan, I know that he has made a personal commitment to speak *only* from experience.  So his experiences are different than yours.  What&#8217;s wrong with that?</p>
<p>I also think that you&#8217;re taking a lot of statements out of context. For instance, you criticize Jonathan for claiming that Agile is mainstream.  Mainstream need not refer to the &#8220;most commonly used or implemented practice.&#8221;  It can also refer to a &#8220;commonly referenced philosophy.&#8221;  So maybe in one sense, Agile isn&#8217;t mainstream, but in another, it certainly qualifies.  Additionally, I assure you that it qualifies in both senses with regard to Jonathan&#8217;s experiences.</p>
<p>I find Jonathan&#8217;s perspective valuable.  He has now given me words to use and references to help me draw my own inferences based on my experiences.  I find that to be both honorable and professional, not pretentious.</p>
<p>If Jonathan were making some attempt to get others to agree with him, or stating that &#8220;this is fact because I say so&#8221;, that would be pretentious, but I don&#8217;t see any of that.  I think Jonathan is very clear that these are *his* thoughts and *his* current way of expressing those thoughts.  I think that is exactly what you are doing here in your blog.  I praise you both for it.</p>
<p>In fact, I also find your counter-position valuable and only wish there were some more links to go with your references.  From where I sit, I don&#8217;t see where your position and Jonathan&#8217;s aren&#8217;t complimentary.  I think you are actually saying very similar things from a different perspective.</p>
<p>I dunno, maybe you are using the tone to create a buzz (you certainly caught my attention).  I just don&#8217;t like to see individuals flamed for sharing their experiences and personal opinions.  </p>
<p>Please, attack the concepts &#8212; we need all of the well informed debate we can get in this industry &#8212; but don&#8217;t flame the person for having the guts to make their observations and interpretations public.</p>
<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s just *my* position.  Pretentious?  Controversial?  Argumentative?  Self-Righteous?  Unpopular?  Maybe, but whatever it is, it is mine and I&#8217;m willing to share it with others and I think that matters.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
Scott Barber<br />
President &amp; Chief Technologist, PerfTestPlus, Inc.<br />
Executive Director, Association for Software Testing<br />
<a href="http://www.perftestplus.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.perftestplus.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.associationforsoftwaretesting.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.associationforsoftwaretesting.org</a></p>
<p>&#8220;If you can see it in your mind&#8230;<br />
     you will find it in your life.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

