<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkedIn and Out and In Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/192/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/192</link>
	<description>The Consulting Software Tester</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:21:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael M. Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/192/comment-page-1#comment-187471</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael M. Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 01:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satisfice.com/blog/?p=192#comment-187471</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clearing that up, Mr O&#039;Dowd. I&#039;ll be sure to pay close attention to all your posts in the future. I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll learn a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clearing that up, Mr O&#8217;Dowd. I&#8217;ll be sure to pay close attention to all your posts in the future. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll learn a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David O'Dowd</title>
		<link>http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/192/comment-page-1#comment-187286</link>
		<dc:creator>David O'Dowd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 05:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satisfice.com/blog/?p=192#comment-187286</guid>
		<description>You did!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael M. Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/192/comment-page-1#comment-186067</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael M. Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 07:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satisfice.com/blog/?p=192#comment-186067</guid>
		<description>The real downside on this is: You, James, have been my colleague for going on 21 years now, but we only worked together at Apple for six months. So if I play their game, who ends up looking stupid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real downside on this is: You, James, have been my colleague for going on 21 years now, but we only worked together at Apple for six months. So if I play their game, who ends up looking stupid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael M. Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/192/comment-page-1#comment-186042</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael M. Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 01:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satisfice.com/blog/?p=192#comment-186042</guid>
		<description>As I&#039;ve mentioned elsewhere, I&#039;ve so far not used LinkedIn beyond figuratively dipping my toe in, because I decline to accept its design (or lack of it). The final straw for me was pretty soon after I created my account, when I found out that for me to list another LinkedIn client as a colleague, I&#039;d have to specify a company we both work[ed] for and a set of dates.

BZZZT. Thanks for playing, LinkedIn, but &quot;colleague&quot; does not mean &quot;co-worker&quot;, and I refuse to pretend that it does. I&#039;ll just have to manage my career without your asinine procrustean broken &quot;design&quot;.

Do I sound judgmental?

&lt;em&gt;[James&#039; Reply: Yeah, that sucks!]&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve mentioned elsewhere, I&#8217;ve so far not used LinkedIn beyond figuratively dipping my toe in, because I decline to accept its design (or lack of it). The final straw for me was pretty soon after I created my account, when I found out that for me to list another LinkedIn client as a colleague, I&#8217;d have to specify a company we both work[ed] for and a set of dates.</p>
<p>BZZZT. Thanks for playing, LinkedIn, but &#8220;colleague&#8221; does not mean &#8220;co-worker&#8221;, and I refuse to pretend that it does. I&#8217;ll just have to manage my career without your asinine procrustean broken &#8220;design&#8221;.</p>
<p>Do I sound judgmental?</p>
<p><em>[James' Reply: Yeah, that sucks!]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/192/comment-page-1#comment-185659</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satisfice.com/blog/?p=192#comment-185659</guid>
		<description>I feel bad for adding you to my linkedin profile recently now. O well sorry about that...

&lt;i&gt;[James&#039; Reply: Did I accept your connection? If so then congratulations, you win. I don&#039;t accept everyone.]&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel bad for adding you to my linkedin profile recently now. O well sorry about that&#8230;</p>
<p><i>[James' Reply: Did I accept your connection? If so then congratulations, you win. I don't accept everyone.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dumitru</title>
		<link>http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/192/comment-page-1#comment-171569</link>
		<dc:creator>Dumitru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satisfice.com/blog/?p=192#comment-171569</guid>
		<description>Indeed interesting. 
Even though you weren&#039;t expecting this, now, looking back do you think it is the right thing to do? Having everything in mind, usability, friendliness (if I may say so), privacy and so on.
&lt;em&gt;
[James&#039; Reply: It&#039;s not the way LinkedIn should behave. They warned me that my contacts would go away, but did not warn me about recommendations, and they didn&#039;t warn anyone else, either. So, at least one person I had recommended thought I was angry with him and had revoked his recommendation. The system should have generated messages to the LinkedIn inboxes of my contacts advising them that I had left. God knows they generate lots of other messages!]&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed interesting.<br />
Even though you weren&#8217;t expecting this, now, looking back do you think it is the right thing to do? Having everything in mind, usability, friendliness (if I may say so), privacy and so on.<br />
<em><br />
[James' Reply: It's not the way LinkedIn should behave. They warned me that my contacts would go away, but did not warn me about recommendations, and they didn't warn anyone else, either. So, at least one person I had recommended thought I was angry with him and had revoked his recommendation. The system should have generated messages to the LinkedIn inboxes of my contacts advising them that I had left. God knows they generate lots of other messages!]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bramblejam</title>
		<link>http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/192/comment-page-1#comment-171553</link>
		<dc:creator>Bramblejam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satisfice.com/blog/?p=192#comment-171553</guid>
		<description>I think this is the issue Facebook recently tripped over. Your recommendations are your property, so if you go they go too. I think there are quite a few decisions yet to be made about the circumstances around leaving social networking sites and what we expect to be left behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is the issue Facebook recently tripped over. Your recommendations are your property, so if you go they go too. I think there are quite a few decisions yet to be made about the circumstances around leaving social networking sites and what we expect to be left behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

