<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Context-Driven Testing Clarified</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/139/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/139</link>
	<description>The Consulting Software Tester</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erwin Van Trier</title>
		<link>http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/139/comment-page-1#comment-166286</link>
		<dc:creator>Erwin Van Trier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/139#comment-166286</guid>
		<description>I consider the stakeholder to be a crucial role in the context-driven school.
Very often I have seen that the stakeholder is considered to be synonimous for the user. 

This misconception results in testing that is not good enough.

The stakeholder group includes many more people/roles. The users are a small part of the stakeholder group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I consider the stakeholder to be a crucial role in the context-driven school.<br />
Very often I have seen that the stakeholder is considered to be synonimous for the user. </p>
<p>This misconception results in testing that is not good enough.</p>
<p>The stakeholder group includes many more people/roles. The users are a small part of the stakeholder group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erwin Van Trier</title>
		<link>http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/139/comment-page-1#comment-166284</link>
		<dc:creator>Erwin Van Trier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/139#comment-166284</guid>
		<description>Bret Pettichord was involved in the initial publication of the definition.
I didn't see Bret's name under the clarification.
I just wonder if Bret has contributed to this effort or if this clarification does not represent Bret's point of view (and if not, why?).
&lt;em&gt;
[James' Reply: Bret Pettichord and Brian Marick focus on test tools and Agile school test ideas, these days. I don't know if they would agree with us about context-driven things, but I suspect they aren't interested.]&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bret Pettichord was involved in the initial publication of the definition.<br />
I didn&#8217;t see Bret&#8217;s name under the clarification.<br />
I just wonder if Bret has contributed to this effort or if this clarification does not represent Bret&#8217;s point of view (and if not, why?).<br />
<em><br />
[James' Reply: Bret Pettichord and Brian Marick focus on test tools and Agile school test ideas, these days. I don't know if they would agree with us about context-driven things, but I suspect they aren't interested.]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


